Build and check your code
Your team and AI agents work from the same Glages model. Requirements, tests, and implementation checks share the same business logic.
using ready-made Glages
business process models
Don’t rebuild standard business logic from scratch. Start with a process model that defines its rules, data, actions, and outcomes in a form software can check.
Your team and AI agents work from the same Glages model. Requirements, tests, and implementation checks share the same business logic.
Your application applies that model to current data, checks actions before execution, and stops when the required conditions are not met.
The structure behind a process:
The objects in a process and how they relate
What can change, and under which conditions
Required facts and acceptable sources
What is allowed, what is blocked, and for whom
Available operations and their possible results
When to stop, and what evidence to record
AI interprets a request and proposes an action. Your application checks it against the Glages model and current data before execution. An agent’s suggestion is not permission to move money or change an order.
Your application blocks actions that violate the model’s rules before they happen—not after the damage is done.
Missing a required fact? The operation stops. The system identifies what is missing instead of choosing the most likely answer.
Recorded data, checks, and decision reasons help your team understand why an action was allowed or stopped.
For example, issue a refund
Glages model + current data
Required conditions are met. The operation may proceed.
The operation does not run. The reason is recorded.
Execution waits for missing facts or a reliable status.
An external service failure is recorded separately. It is not a business-rule rejection.
To keep AI actions under control, developers make model checks a required part of the application’s execution path. Every governed operation must pass through them. Putting a model in a prompt is not the same as enforcing its rules in software.
The customer paid $2,000. A partial refund of $800 was approved. Another $800 may stay below the original payment—but would pay the same refund twice.
One agent already submitted the refund but received no response. The customer follows up through another channel—and a second agent is ready to send it again.
The application checks the original operation first. It won’t authorize a new payout while the outcome is unknown.
Don’t pay it again
Resolve the status. Don’t create a new payout
Recheck eligibility before another attempt
One Glages model defines the rules for both agents—from development through runtime.
Use one business-refund ID and durable shared state across channels. Check eligibility and register an attempt atomically, so two agents cannot both pass the same check.
A network retry belongs to the original operation; it is not a new payout. Persist the idempotency key and parameters before sending, and respect the provider’s contract and key-retention window.
Reconcile the original result through the API or authenticated provider events, handling duplicates and late arrivals. Confirmed pending and unknown are distinct states, though neither permits a new payout. Escalate unresolved outcomes rather than sending another payment.
Use Glages models to build and check code with AI agents. After launch, run routine business logic in conventional software—not through unnecessary LLM calls.
Rules, required data, and modeled process variations are defined in Glages. Use that foundation in an application or workflow, then reuse it in other compatible projects.
Code, requirements, and tests share one model. Checking an implementation against it helps identify violations of business rules before launch.
Conventional code handles routine rules. Where that replaces LLM calls, token usage falls. Keep AI for interpretation and generation—not for reconstructing the rules.
The model preserves process rules and constraints. The next developer or agent gets code with its context, without having to rediscover how the process works.
Start with a single task or connect multiple workflows in your application. Choose a relevant example, then talk with us about model scope and availability.
A business-domain model connects multiple workflows and the rules that keep them in sync.
A process model covers an individual workflow and can be reused across compatible projects.
Connect orders, payments, fulfillment, and customer service.
Once an item has shipped, the available actions change: a return workflow replaces a simple cancellation.
Connect reservations, payments, and room readiness.
A reservation alone does not authorize check-in: dates, payment, guest identity, and room readiness also matter.
Coordinate handoffs, delivery, and exception handling.
Creating a label does not confirm a carrier handoff: the status change needs the appropriate evidence.
Connect agreements, access, and property maintenance.
Renewing or ending an agreement needs coordinated changes to access rights and related obligations.
Connect diagnosis, estimates, approved work, and vehicle handover.
Finding another fault does not authorize a higher bill: additional work requires its own approval.
For a defined insurance line, coverage scope, and applicable rules.
A payout depends on confirmed coverage, evidence, and the claim decision—not just the amount requested.
Coordinate project milestones, changes, and payments.
A milestone payment depends on the required acceptance evidence, not just a report that the work is complete.
Coordinate appointments, documents, and billing—not clinical decisions.
An appointment does not establish that required documents and consent are in place; these remain separate conditions.
Connect records, approvals, and settlement under a defined accounting scope.
A paid invoice and a settled obligation are different states: a reconciliation mismatch requires its own resolution.
Coordinate requests, approved work, and completion evidence.
A technician finishing the job and a customer accepting it are separate events with different consequences.
Link a payment to an obligation and confirmation from the required source.
A message saying “I paid” does not replace confirmation from the payment service.
Check eligibility, the permitted amount, and prior refund attempts.
An unknown result from the first attempt does not authorize a second payout for the same obligation.
Determine available actions from the current shipment state.
Changing an address after carrier handoff needs a different workflow from a change before shipping.
Track resource availability, holds, and expiration.
Concurrent requests must account for active holds, not just the resource’s original availability.
Tie approval to an authorized person and a specific request version.
Approval of an earlier estimate does not authorize a new amount or a different scope of work.
Define required records, accepted sources, and validity conditions.
Having a file does not establish that the document is valid or applies to this case.
Keep requests, evidence, and compensation tied to the same case.
Two contacts about the same claim must not automatically create two compensation payments.
Connect diagnosis, authorized work, and acceptance.
Work outside the approved estimate requires new authorization—not an AI assumption.
Connect the basis for an invoice, its amount, and the underlying obligation.
A repeated completion message must not, by itself, create a second invoice for the same milestone.
Track which terms apply after an agreed change.
New dates or amounts must consistently replace earlier terms across the affected workflows.
Payments, reservations, and document checks recur across industries. The Glages factory reuses compatible process models to build business-domain models, rather than rebuilding the same logic.
Build vertical software, AI products, CRM, ERP, and self-service applications on shared business logic.
Build solutions for different clients on a reusable foundation. Focus on integrations and client needs rather than formalizing the same processes again.
Connect existing systems into governed workflows with explicit execution conditions, constraints, and reasons to stop.
Tell us about your project. We’ll discuss the right model, the scenarios it needs to cover, and what’s available to get started.
Choose one workflow in your application or automation. Use it to evaluate the work a model can reduce and the operations it can help control.
Which systems and AI tools do you use? What matters most: development time, AI costs, or operational reliability? A short description is enough to start.
We’ll assess fit and integration requirements, then agree on availability, terms, and the scope of the first project.
Your team applies the model to the chosen workflow. Agree on the comparison upfront: development time, rework, token usage, or rule compliance.
Evaluate one workflow first. Expand based on evidence.
Let’s talkLicense a specific Glages model as a foundation for developing and running your applications and automation.
A model can cover one process, such as a refund, or a connected set of processes: ordering, payment, fulfillment, and returns.
We’ll identify a model for your project. If no suitable model is available, we can discuss the feasibility, scope, and timing of a new release.
Glages Model Factory is our system for producing reusable models. The approach combines reusable components, formal checks, and an assessment of coverage for the declared scope. New models build on existing components, tests, and fixes.
An annual license for the selected model
An OEM license to embed a model in your application or platform
Use a model across products or client solutions
Agree upfront on the model, permitted uses, pricing, updates, and support.
Glages models are not neural networks. They define business processes and their rules in a machine-checkable form. They do not replace your agent; they define the process and boundaries it can work within.
A document needs interpretation. A model expresses rules and conditions in a form software can check. With controlled execution, the application checks whether an operation is allowed—not just the agent that proposed it.
No. Control applies to the formalized rules and integrated operations. Models, data, integrations, and external services can still have defects. The goal is to block actions that violate the model and distinguish business outcomes, missing information, and execution failures.
The approach supports incremental adoption and integration through the model’s interface. Compatibility with specific languages, agents, and tools must be checked for the selected model and usage mode.
Your application connects its own data, systems, and model-supported parameters. If a process falls outside the model’s scope, we assess whether another model or version is needed. Agents must not invent missing business rules at runtime.
Not necessarily. You can use AI only during development. At runtime, conventional software, external services, people, or agents can carry out the process within the model’s requirements.
We can discuss your project and a potential pilot. Glages is in development; availability, tooling, and timelines are determined for each model.
The cards illustrate potential applications. We assess whether a suitable released model exists, what it covers, and what your implementation would require.
Tell us what you’re building and where you use AI. We’ll discuss a suitable use case, integration requirements, and how to evaluate a pilot.
A short description is enough. Please don’t include confidential information.